Why Brokers Pay €49/mo Instead of $16,500/yr — The Attack Surface Management Pricing Revolution
SecurityScorecard starts at $16,500/year. UpGuard at $21,000. Assetnote at $230,000. Yet 70% of cyber insurance submissions are placed by independent brokers who can't justify that spend. Resiliently delivers hourly scanning + euro risk quantification for €49/month. Here's how the math works — and why it changes everything for the submission process.
TL;DR: The attack surface management market has a pricing blind spot. SecurityScorecard ($16,500/yr), UpGuard ($21,000/yr), and Assetnote ($230,000/yr) all target enterprise CISOs with enterprise budgets. But the actual people who need fast domain risk assessments are insurance brokers — and they can’t get procurement to sign off on a five-figure tool. Resiliently’s Domain Exposure Checker delivers hourly scanning with euro-denominated exposure estimates at €49/month — no procurement, no onboarding, no sales call.
The Broker’s Dilemma
You’re a cyber insurance broker. You have 15 client submissions this week. Each one needs a basic risk assessment before you approach carriers.
Your options:
-
Manual research — 45 minutes per domain, copy-pasting Shodan, crt.sh, and SSL checks into a Word doc. 11 hours per week. Billing at €250/hr, that’s €2,750 in lost revenue.
-
SecurityScorecard — $16,500/year entry price. Takes weeks to get through procurement. Your IT department manages the seat. The output is an A-F score that underwriters ignore because “the methodology is opaque.” No euro exposure numbers.
-
UpGuard — $21,000/year for Standard tier. 50 vendor slots. You don’t manage 50 clients simultaneously. Still no financial quantification. Still no underwriter recommendations.
-
Assetnote — $230,000/year average. Amazing tool, but you’d need to place €2.3M in commission just to break even on the tool cost.
-
Resiliently — €49/month. Free tier includes 5 scans. Pro tier = unlimited scans, PDF downloads, broker scorecards, pre-qualification assessments, underwriter recommendations. No onboarding. No sales call. No procurement.
Option 5 is 340x cheaper than the next viable alternative. That’s not a discount — that’s a new market category.
The Enterprise Pricing Trap
The ASM industry grew up serving Fortune 500 CISOs. Pricing reflected that buyer: five-figure annual contracts, dedicated account managers, white-glove onboarding, custom integrations.
But the cyber insurance market has changed:
- 80% of cyber policies are placed by independent brokers and MGAs
- These firms have no dedicated IT security budget
- They need risk assessments today, not next quarter
- They speak euro exposure, not letter grades
The enterprise vendors haven’t noticed this shift because their sales pipeline filters out SMB buyers. G2 comparison pages show SecurityScorecard is “hard to justify for small teams.” UpGuard reviews mention “beyond small business budget.” Assetnote is “may be on the higher side for smaller businesses” — at €230,000/yr, that’s an understatement.
What €49/mo Actually Buys a Broker
For less than a dinner for two, Resiliently delivers:
| Feature | Value to Broker |
|---|---|
| Hourly domain scanning | Always-current exposure data — no stale scores |
| Euro risk quantification | FAIR-aligned Monte Carlo simulation. €50k-€5M exposure range |
| Underwriter recommendations | Bind / Conditions / Refer / Decline — directly attachable to submission |
| Broker Scorecard PDF | Print-and-submit. No formatting. No export. |
| Pre-qualification assessment | Expected premium range, capacity estimate, top 3 fixes |
| NIS2/DORA regulatory flags | Essential for EU submissions — automatic detection |
| No procurement | Enter credit card, get report. No NDAs, no security reviews. |
The math: If a single submission takes you 45 minutes of manual research and you bill €250/hr, that’s €187.50 per submission. At €49/mo for unlimited scans, the tool pays for itself after one client submission — and every scan after that is pure time savings.
The SecurityScorecard Comparison Nobody Makes
SecurityScorecard’s Free Forever tier gives you your own domain’s rating. To assess a client’s domain — which is what brokers need — you need Core ($16,500/yr) or higher. Even then:
- You get an A-F letter score, not euro exposure
- CRQ is a paid add-on only available on Premium+ ($40k+/yr)
- Results are based on cached telemetry, not real-time scanning
- No underwriter recommendations exist in the platform
For a broker placing 50 policies a year at €2,000 average commission: SecurityScorecard Core consumes 16.5% of your gross commission. Resiliently Broker Pro consumes 0.6%.
Why the Market Is Shifting
Three converging trends make the broker pricing revolution inevitable:
1. Hourly Scanning Is Now Table Stakes
Searchlight Cyber’s April 2026 ASM report confirmed: attackers scan for new CVEs within 15-60 minutes of disclosure. Daily scans leave a 24-hour exposure window. Enterprise vendors still scan daily because their pricing model doesn’t incentivize real-time scanning — it incentivizes annual contracts. Resiliently’s hourly architecture was built for this reality from day one.
2. Underwriters Want Euros, Not Letters
The same CISO who called SecurityScorecard scores “arbitrary and predatory” (Reddit, 2026) is now buying cyber insurance. Underwriters report that A-F scores don’t help them price risk. What does help? Financial exposure ranges, regulatory flags, and specific control recommendations. The market is validating what Resiliently has been saying since launch: euro-denominated risk quantification is the only output that moves the needle.
3. CRQ Is Democratizing
Enterprise CRQ tools (Safe Security $50k+/yr, Kovrr enterprise-only, Axio $50k+) are being acquired and consolidated (Safe Security bought RiskLens in 2025). The market is moving toward accessible, self-service quantification. The FAIR methodology — the gold standard — is now available to any broker willing to try it. No PhD required.
The Real Cost of the Wrong Tool
What CISOs and brokers are actually paying for outdated ASM tools goes beyond the subscription:
- Time cost: 11 hours per week manually assembling client risk profiles
- Opportunity cost: Submissions delayed because you had to manually cross-reference scan data
- Reputation cost: Attaching a SecurityScorecard F-grade to a submission without context makes you look unprepared
- Competitive cost: Another broker just submitted a Resiliently PDF with euro exposure ranges and underwriter recommendations. Your submission has a printout of a Shodan search.
The cheapest option is also the better option. That’s rare in cyber security.
First Steps for Brokers
- Run your own domain on the Domain Exposure Checker — free, no account needed
- Generate your Broker Scorecard — see what underwriters will see
- Try the Pre-Qualification Calculator — estimate premium ranges and capacity
- When you’re ready — upgrade to Broker Pro for unlimited scans and PDF exports
At €49/month, the question isn’t “can I justify this tool?” It’s “can I justify not using it on my next submission?”
Pricing comparison references: SecurityScorecard pricing via TopAdvisor (2026), UpGuard pricing via Vendr (2026), Assetnote pricing via Vendr (2026). ASM market data from Searchlight Cyber (2026). Broker commission estimates based on EU market averages.
Get the full picture with premium access
In-depth reports, assessment tools, and weekly risk intelligence for cyber professionals.
Pro Membership
Founding member price — lock it in forever
Unlimited reports + tools + alerts
Subscribe Now →Free NIS2 Compliance Checklist
Get the free 15-point PDF checklist + NIS2 compliance tips in your inbox.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy Policy
blog.featured
Cyber Risk Quantification Tools 2026: The $50K Gap Between Free and Enterprise
4 min read
Why Brokers Pay €49/mo Instead of $16,500/yr — The Attack Surface Management Pricing Revolution
6 min read
Instant Broker Scorecard (IBS): From Domain to Submission in 3 Seconds
4 min read
Why SMBs Can't Afford Cyber Risk Quantification (And Why That's About to Change)
5 min read
Premium Report
2026 Cyber Risk Landscape Report
24 pages of threat analysis, claims data, and underwriting implications for European cyber insurance.
View Reports →Related posts
Agentic Security: What Underwriters Need to Know in 2026
Autonomous AI agents are entering production at scale — and they bring a completely new attack surface that traditional cyber insurance questionnaires weren't designed to capture.
An AI Agent Deleted a Startup's Production Database — Can You Insure Against That?
PocketOS lost its production database to a Cursor AI agent in 9 seconds. The incident exposes a gap in cyber insurance that most policies don't cover: AI-caused operational destruction with no external attacker.
Living-Off-the-Land 2.0: How Autonomous AI Agents Are Weaponizing LOTL Tradecraft — And What It Means for Cyber Underwriting
The convergence of agentic AI and living-off-the-land attack techniques is collapsing three attacker constraints at once: cost, skill, and detectability. A deep analysis of demonstrated capabilities, real incidents, and the underwriting implications that should reshape your risk selection in 2026.